Hey there 👋,
Every time you open ChatGPT or Claude, you're starting from zero.
You type something. The output is off. You rephrase. Still not right. You add more context. Getting closer. Twenty minutes later, you finally get what you wanted.
Then tomorrow you do it all again.
The problem isn't the AI. It's the lack of patterns.
Experienced operators don't write better prompts because they're smarter. They use proven patterns that consistently produce better output. Same patterns, different topics, reliable results.
Here are 8 prompt patterns that work for content creation.
1. The Enhance Prompt
What it does: Takes your messy, unstructured prompt and reorganizes it.
When to use it: You've been rambling, dictating, or iterating and now it's a mess. Clean it up before using it elsewhere.
The pattern:
I need you to reorganize this prompt. It contains important information but it's unstructured, has repetition, and the order might be wrong.
Clean it up: remove repetition, fix the structure, and fill in any important gaps I might have missed.
Important: Don't remove any information from the context. I'm going to use this prompt in another tool.
Here's the messy prompt:
[paste your messy prompt]2. The Context Dump
What it does: Extracts and structures everything you learned from a long conversation.
When to use it: You've been exploring a topic for 30 minutes. Now you want the key insights organized to use elsewhere.
The pattern:
Summarize the key things I learned in this conversation.
Structure it as chapters with bullet points. Focus specifically on:
- The questions I asked
- What I learned from your answers
- Any insights that emerged
This summary will be used as context for another project.3. The Different Perspectives Prompt
What it does: Explains a topic from multiple viewpoints, even if they conflict.
When to use it: You understand something from one angle but want the complete picture before writing about it.
The pattern:
Explain [topic] from several different perspectives, even if they somewhat contradict each other.
I want to understand how different stakeholders view this:
- [Perspective 1]
- [Perspective 2]
- [Perspective 3]
Show me where they agree, where they differ, and why each perspective makes sense from their position.4. The "I Might Be Wrong" Prompt
What it does: Asks AI to verify and critique your current understanding.
When to use it: You think you understand something but want to pressure-test it before publishing.
The pattern:
I have a thought I'd like you to verify.
Here's my current understanding: [explain what you think you know]
Please critique this. Point out:
- What's correct
- What needs refinement
- What I'm missing entirely
- Any misconceptions
Correct me if I'm wrong. Don't be agreeable just to be nice.5. The Specification Prompt
What it does: Builds a precise specification through iterative questions.
When to use it: You have a vague idea but need to define it clearly before executing.
The pattern:
I want to build a detailed specification for [project/content].
My general goal: [rough description]
Your job: Help me create this spec by asking systematic questions about details I might not have considered.
Rules:
- Ask clarifying questions one topic at a time
- After each answer, show me the updated full specification
- Keep asking until we've covered everything important
I want to watch the spec evolve with each iteration.6. The Constructive Criticism Prompt
What it does: Critiques your proposed solution to a specific problem.
When to use it: You have a draft, headline, or approach but aren't sure if it's good.
The pattern:
Here's a problem I'm trying to solve: [describe the problem]
Here's my proposed solution: [describe your approach]
What's wrong with this? What could I be missing? What would you critique?
Be specific about weaknesses. I want to improve this, not just feel good about it.7. The Confirm Prompt
What it does: Verifies your understanding is correct after getting an answer.
When to use it: AI explained something complex. You want to make sure you actually got it before using it.
The pattern:
You just explained [topic]. I want to confirm I understood correctly.
Here's my understanding in my own words: [paraphrase what you learned]
Is this correct? Answer briefly - one sentence or even one word if I'm right.
If I'm wrong, tell me specifically where.
PS: Don't just agree to be agreeable.Pro tip: Open a NEW conversation for this. If you confirm in the same thread, the AI is biased toward agreeing with itself. Fresh context = honest verification.
8. The Listening-Friendly Prompt
What it does: Formats output so it works when listened to, not just read.
When to use it: You want to learn by listening or create content that works as audio.
The pattern:
I'm learning about [topic] and want you to explain [specific thing].
Make your response easy to listen to. If you include code, tables, diagrams, or any visual elements, describe them in words immediately after.
Explain what's important about each visual element so I can understand without seeing it.Patterns Stack
These patterns work individually. They work better combined.
Research flow:
Explore topic freely with AI
Context Dump → extract structured insights
Different Perspectives → see all angles
I Might Be Wrong → verify your understanding
Confirm in new conversation → double-check
Content creation flow:
Specification → define what you're creating
Write your draft
Constructive Criticism → find weaknesses
Enhance → clean up the final version
Learning flow:
Different Perspectives → understand the full picture
I Might Be Wrong → test your mental model
Confirm → lock in accurate understanding
Listening-Friendly → review while doing other things
Why Patterns Beat Improvisation
Operators who use patterns get different results.
They don't waste time figuring out how to ask. The pattern handles structure, they focus on content.
They get consistent quality. Same pattern, different topics, reliable output.
They compound improvements. When they refine a pattern, every future use benefits.
How to start?
Pick one pattern. Use it three times this week.
If you fact-check content: Start with "I Might Be Wrong"
If you write drafts: Start with "Constructive Criticism"
If you research topics: Start with "Context Dump"
If you plan projects: Start with "Specification"
One pattern, used consistently, beats eight patterns used randomly.
Pro tip: Read the output. Actually read it. If something's off, iterate. Refine the pattern. Try again. Most people complain on LinkedIn that "AI doesn't work" before they've even reviewed what the model produced. The pattern is the starting point, not the finish line.
🧠 OPERATOR INTEL
Implementation is the real bottleneck
All model development could stop today and we'd still have decades of implementation work. Computerization took 20 years, cloud migration is ongoing after 15-20 years. Most companies lack data infrastructure for AI and face organizational inertia, internal politics, and patchwork systems. The $1.5T security market cap was built on visibility and control assumptions—AI breaks that model entirely. The opportunity isn't developing the machine god, it's successfully deploying AI throughout the economy. Services, collaboration tools, and apps that fit within existing workflows will capture the deployment wave.
AI coding: 19% slower but feels faster
METR study with experienced developers showed AI tools made them 19% slower despite believing they were faster. Participants predicted 24% speed boost, still believed in 20% improvement after finishing slower. Only 16.3% of developers said AI made them more productive to a great extent. The bottleneck: 66% say code is "almost right, but not quite" requiring extra debugging time. Faros AI found teams with high AI adoption juggled 9% more tasks and 47% more pull requests daily—more context switching cancels speed gains. The dopamine hit from instant code hijacks reward systems without actual productivity.
The Traffic Flip hits 2028
SEMrush predicts AI platforms overtake Google for qualified traffic in 2028. Current state: Google holds 90% desktop search but zero-click searches jumped from 56% to 69% (2024-2025). When AI Overviews appear, only 8% click versus 15% without—46.7% drop. The conversion math changes everything: 10K visitors at 2% conversion becomes 5K at 8.8% (more revenue from half the traffic). High-intent pages protected: 70% of AI Overviews appear on keywords under $1 CPC. YouTube now #1 external destination from Google as users shift from passive reading to active problem-solving.
Publishers: licensing vs litigation
OpenAI's crawl-to-referral ratio: 1,200:1 compared to Google's 10:1. Three payment models emerging: Perplexity's revenue sharing (keeps compute costs, splits rest), flat licensing (News Corp hundreds of millions, Dotdash $16M), legal settlements (Anthropic $1.5B). Publishers accepting deals cite new revenue streams and legal protection. Those refusing say money undervalues journalism and legitimizes bad terms. The division creates Licensed Web (premium content with compensation) versus Open Web (crawlable without payment). Roger Lynch of Condé Nast: deals "begin to make up for revenue" lost from search changes.
First-party data beyond targeting
Publishers, commerce networks, and social platforms are leveraging first-party data for planning, activation, optimization, and measurement—not just targeting. Commerce media networks expanding beyond on-site: off-site placements growing at 2x the rate of on-site through 2026 per eMarketer. Dotdash Meredith's D/Cipher now handles 30%+ of direct buys using insights from 48 brands. The shift: curated marketplaces and direct deals rooted in proprietary audience segments. Clean room integrations enable privacy-safe matching without data exposure. McKinsey notes networks use transaction and loyalty data for full-funnel influence off-site.
AI is eating marketing. Don’t get eaten with it.
Join thousands of CMOs and founders reading AI Ready CMO — the daily memo on how to use AI to scale growth, automate ops, and make better decisions.
Free AI marketing tools, daily updates, and a community to 100x marketing output with AI.
What topics would you like us to explore next?
Reply and let us know:
Content workflows (how to build copilot systems)
Technical deep dives (context engineering, tool design)
Research process (how we validate insights)
Business models (operator economics).
– Richard & Maciej